Coco vs Chronos (formerly Geodo)

Chronos is the GTM product formerly called Geodo. As of 2026-10-31, the Geodo app at app.geodo.ai (opens in a new tab) redirects to the sign-in page of Chronos, and Chronos's own llms.txt (opens in a new tab) describes itself as "built by Chronos Labs (formerly Geodo)". Meanwhile geodo.ai (opens in a new tab)'s homepage now describes "Diagnostic imaging AI that clinics and hospitals can trust" (a radiology copilot called Lumen), while older Geodo GTM pages, such as its pricing page (opens in a new tab), are still online and match what chronos.ro (opens in a new tab) says today. So whether you are looking for a Chronos alternative or a Geodo AI alternative, the product you are comparing against is the same: a "GTM digital twin" that reads your website and runs outbound across many channels. Coco is an AI co-worker built for GTM work more broadly (research, CRM hygiene, follow-up, meeting prep, campaigns and outbound), approval-first by design, with credit-based pricing.

Facts checked 2026-10-31 against geodo.ai (opens in a new tab), the redirect from app.geodo.ai (opens in a new tab), and Chronos's site (opens in a new tab), pricing page (opens in a new tab) and integrations page (opens in a new tab). Vendors change pricing and features often; check their site for current figures.

Apply for the beta → · Private beta · free with your own API keys, or a paid plan

What Chronos is, in their own framing

The Geodo GTM pages that remain on geodo.ai (opens in a new tab) and the current Chronos site use the same pitch. Chronos's homepage says: "Drop your website and we'll automate your entire GTM." Its info page (opens in a new tab) spells out the steps: paste your website; Chronos "reads your site, learns your product, your tone, your ICP, and your differentiators"; it builds your "GTM digital twin"; it spins up channels, including fresh email domains; and "the campaigns run themselves". Per that page, it finds ideal customers in a 350M-lead database, writes a personalized message to each one, and sends a recommended daily volume per channel.

The channel list is wide. The homepage says its Geo Agent "finds your ICP, researches every buyer, and runs LinkedIn, email, X, Reddit and Instagram in plain English", and the info page adds SMS, AgentMail and Facebook. You start campaigns with a sentence, or plug in another AI agent over MCP. Beyond outbound, Chronos describes pipeline mastery (opens in a new tab) (deal-risk flags and next-action recommendations) and deal coaching. Each customer, per the info page, is paired with a builder from the Chronos team who reviews campaigns and tunes the prompts.

A third-party directory, MOGE (opens in a new tab), still lists Geodo with geodo.ai as its site and describes it as a GTM digital twin "that learns your voice, buyers, and deals". That listing is not first-party.

Where Chronos is the right call

Honest section. Chronos (formerly Geodo) is the right call when:

• You want outbound running on many channels from one paste. Chronos's pitch is a website in, campaigns out, across email, LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Instagram, SMS and more. If channel breadth for outbound is the job, that is its design center.
• You want sending infrastructure handled for you. Its info page (opens in a new tab) says it provisions fresh sending domains and paces a recommended daily volume per channel for deliverability.
• You want a free start and a managed option. The pricing page (opens in a new tab) (also still live at geodo.ai/pricing (opens in a new tab)) lists a browser app at $0 to start, plus custom-priced Managed GTM and Enterprise plans where its team configures the product around your ICP, outbound and pipeline.
• You are comfortable with outbound on autopilot. Chronos describes campaigns that "run themselves", with you "in the loop only when it matters". For teams who want that posture, it's a feature.

If those map to your situation, Chronos is a credible focused play. The rest of this page is about why Coco's broader GTM scope and approval-first posture land better for teams whose work spans more than outbound.

Where Coco is the right call (the wedge)

Coco's wedge sits in three places.

Durable execution across the full GTM workload. Coco's surface area is twelve named workflows that ship pre-built: find design partners, clean CRM data, draft cold outreach, automate follow-ups, prep sales meetings, research accounts, enrich contacts, LinkedIn outreach, reactivate stalled deals, segment marketing lists, launch campaigns, route leads. Coco runs each as a durable, resumable strategy over a vetted action registry, so a multi-step plan survives interruption and picks up where it left off. For a team whose GTM bottleneck is a portfolio of execution gaps (CRM rotting because nobody has time, follow-ups dropping at the qualified stage, marketing-to-sales handoffs broken, ops work piling up), Coco executes against that workload. See the GTM execution gap argument →.

Approval-first by design, with autonomy you can audit. Every external action (send email, write CRM, post Slack, spend on third-party API) gates on your approval, with a hard, no-bypass floor on customer-facing actions, gated on GTM semantics. Beyond that floor, you can graduate specific workflows to gated, confidence-scored autonomy after they prove out inside guardrails you define: it runs continuously and monitored, pauses and resumes within the bounds you grant, and every step is confidence-scored and logged. Chronos's own pages describe a different default for outbound: campaigns that run themselves. For teams whose brand reputation, deliverability posture, or deal-stage data can't absorb a confidently-wrong AI action, that floor plus the audit trail matters. Each user also runs in a dedicated, isolated agent container.

Credit-based pricing that maps to GTM unit work. Coco's credits map to GTM-specific units with the cost visible before approval. About 4-6 credits per drafted cold outreach email. About 8 credits per pre-meeting brief. About 1-2 credits per record enriched. About 25 credits to shortlist 5-10 design-partner candidates from a target segment. The Hobby tier is $0/month, free with your own API keys once your beta application is approved. Chronos also starts free; its team plans are custom-priced, and its pricing page says that is because team deployments vary.

Feature-by-feature comparison

Chronos column sources: chronos.ro (opens in a new tab), info (opens in a new tab), pricing (opens in a new tab), integrations (opens in a new tab).

Pricing comparison

Chronos's pricing page (opens in a new tab) lists three plans: a browser app at "$0 to start", Managed GTM at a custom price, and Enterprise with custom deployment. It does not publish team prices; its FAQ says custom pricing "avoids publishing a fake one-size-fits-all price" because deployments vary.

Coco's pricing is credit-based and published. Hobby: $0/month, free with your own API keys once your beta application is approved. Founder: $40/month with 5,000 credits plus à la carte top-ups. Team: custom with pooled credits across the team, shared memory, admin audit. Credit-to-task mapping is visible on every plan card before approval, so the cost of running a workflow is known before you authorize it.

The products do overlapping but different things, so a dollar-for-dollar comparison is hard. Both have a free entry point (Coco's after beta approval); compare the team price you are quoted for Chronos with the credit cost of the Coco workflows you would actually run. See Coco's full pricing breakdown →.

Apply for the beta → · Private beta · free with your own API keys, or a paid plan

How a target-list-to-outreach workflow runs in each

Same task: "Build a target list of 30 mid-market RevOps leaders at B2B SaaS companies hiring for ops, research the top 15, and run first-touch outreach."

In Chronos (formerly Geodo): per its info page (opens in a new tab), Chronos already holds your ICP, tone and positioning from the website it read. You describe the campaign in a sentence. It finds matching people in its lead database, writes a personalized message to each, and sends at a recommended daily volume per channel, on email, LinkedIn or the other channels you've connected. Your assigned Chronos builder reviews campaigns and tunes the prompts.

In Coco: Describe the task in chat. Coco proposes a plan card: research pass on 30 accounts (~150 credits for deep research on the top 15 plus a lighter pass on the rest), 15 drafted first-touches (~75 credits), and queue logic for the remaining 15. Approve the plan. Coco runs the work, queues the drafts in your Gmail Drafts folder, and surfaces them for your approval. Nothing sends until you approve each one. The output integrates with whatever CRM you run; Coco logs the activity and proposes record updates for your approval. See the cold-outreach drafting workflow → and the design-partner search workflow → for the deeper patterns.

The output looks similar where the workflows overlap. The path differs in two ways. Chronos is built to run outbound at volume across many channels, with sending on autopilot. Coco gates each customer-facing send by default and applies the same approval posture to CRM writes and campaign work, with the credit cost visible on the plan card before you approve.

When to pick which

Honest decision matrix.

Pick Chronos (formerly Geodo) if:

• Outbound volume across many channels is your primary GTM bottleneck.
• You want "paste your website" setup and sending domains handled for you.
• You want its team to configure and tune campaigns with you.
• You're comfortable with outbound on autopilot.

Pick Coco if:

• Your GTM workload spans more than outbound: CRM hygiene, follow-up, marketing, ops, lead routing.
• You want approval gates per external action by default, with graduated autonomy as workflows earn trust.
• You want credit-based pricing with the cost-to-output mapping visible per task.
• You want to keep your existing CRM (HubSpot, Salesforce) without orchestration friction. See the full integrations list →.

Use both if:

• Chronos handles high-volume, multi-channel outbound.
• Coco handles the broader workload around and between outbound: CRM hygiene, meeting prep, follow-up, marketing campaigns, ops. See the CRM hygiene workflow → for a sample of work that lives outside outbound.

Still deciding what kind of tool you need? Our Viktor alternatives guide sorts the options by kind, and AI SDR vs AI co-worker explains the split between outbound-first tools and broader GTM co-workers.

Apply for the beta → · Private beta · free with your own API keys, or a paid plan

Frequently asked questions

What happened to Geodo AI?

As of 2026-10-31, the Geodo GTM product runs as Chronos. The Geodo app address (app.geodo.ai) redirects to Chronos's sign-in, and Chronos's llms.txt (opens in a new tab) says it is "built by Chronos Labs (formerly Geodo)". The geodo.ai (opens in a new tab) homepage now describes diagnostic imaging AI for clinics and hospitals, while some older Geodo GTM pages remain on that domain.

Is Coco a Geodo alternative if my main need is outbound?

If you want outbound running on autopilot across many channels, Chronos's design matches that. Coco handles outbound (it's one of the twelve workflows) but with approval gates per send by default. Teams whose outbound depends on the gate are well-fit; teams who want high-volume sending without a per-send review are better served by Chronos or by an AI SDR such as 11x or Artisan.

Can Coco do the "drop your website in" auto-configuration?

Not that pattern. Coco's setup is "connect your tools, hand it a goal, approve the first plan", and the first run on a new workflow produces a plan card with credit costs visible before approval. See how Coco's four-step loop runs →.

How do approval gates compare?

Coco is approval-first by design: a hard, no-bypass floor on every customer-facing action, gated on GTM semantics, with confidence-scored autonomy you can graduate and audit. Chronos's info page (opens in a new tab) describes campaigns that "run themselves", with you "in the loop only when it matters" and an assigned builder reviewing campaigns. For teams who want a default-on gate on every email and CRM write, Coco's posture is more conservative.

Is Coco's scope bigger than Chronos's?

They are shaped differently. Chronos centers on outbound, with pipeline mastery and deal coaching alongside, per its pricing page (opens in a new tab). Coco ships twelve named GTM workflows that span outbound, CRM hygiene, follow-up, marketing, and ops, and executes each as a durable, resumable multi-step strategy.

Pricing: which is cheaper?

Hard to compare without your volume and a quote. Both have a free entry point: Chronos with a browser app at "$0 to start" and custom-priced team plans, Coco with Hobby at $0/month on your own API keys after beta approval, Founder at $40/month with 5,000 credits, and Team custom. Coco shows the credit cost of each workflow before you approve it.

Can I run both?

Yes. Chronos for high-volume, multi-channel outbound; Coco for the broader GTM execution work that sits outside outbound. The two specialize in different parts of the motion.

Get started

If you're shopping AI for GTM and your workload spans more than outbound (CRM hygiene, follow-up, marketing campaigns, ops, lead routing), Coco's Hobby tier is the fastest way to evaluate. Connect one GTM tool, hand Coco one concrete workflow, see whether the broader scope earns the next job.

Apply for the beta → · Private beta · free with your own API keys, or a paid plan

Or book a walkthrough call → (opens in a new tab) if you'd rather see the breadth pattern in action first. For the broader argument about co-worker vs AI SDR vs general agent, see why Coco →.